Saturday, May 16, 2009
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Hate Bill Put On Hold In Senate Judiciary
There was no discussion of the hate bill in Judiciary on Tuesday.
Instead, Sen. Patrick Leahy, Judiciary chairman, said he will inform us when he has decided to move the hate bill through Judiciary, or hold hearings -- if hearings are to be held. He says he will give one week's notice at www.judiciary.senate.gov if the hate bill is to be considered. This means at least a week's delay -- if we can trust Leahy, which I don't.
Yet, possible delay is very good news! It gives lovers of freedom time to thoroughly blacken the reputation of S. 909, accurately describing it as a pedophile-protecting hate bill. Complete documentation for this claim is provided by NPN's latest 9-minute video "Stop the Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill!" on the home page at www.truthtellers.org.
With Democrats in control of Congress and a President pledged to sign the hate bill, they are in a position of great advantage. We have known it would take a great deal of activism by American patriots and a miracle of God to defeat the hate bill, and we have been watching to see what He would do. Viewing hearings in the House Judiciary Committee on April 22-23, I recognized His way of deliverance when Democrats refused Rep. King's amendment excluding homosexual pedophiles from special federal protection. As soon as the bill passed out of committee, I issued an e-alert and was on the radio dramatizing this unbelievable error of judgment and urging all lovers of freedom to call members of the House, urging them not to vote for a bill that protects pedophiles.
Then, when Rep. Alcee Hastings defiantly proclaimed on the floor of the House last week that not only pedophilia but all of the other 546 sexual deviancies, or paraphilias, listed by the American Psychiatric Association would be specially protected under the hate bill, I knew the Lord had delivered the hate bill forces into our hands. We had been given an issue capable of defeating the hate bill where other arguments would fail. Every American, whether conservative or liberal, religious or non-religious, has a visceral disgust at those who rape little boys and girls.
Within hours of Hastings' verbal indiscretion, I increased my media warnings that the hate bill was a pedophile-protecting bill! The next day, our new video, making visual and audible Hastings' declaration, was posted at
I was very gratified that two of the most outspoken evangelical watchdog groups, Janet Porter's Faith2Action and Traditional Values Coalition, soon appreciated what the Democrats had given us.
In a conference call last week with evangelical leaders, hosted by Dr. Wiley Drake, I explained to Janet and others why the pedophile-protecting issue should be magnified. She had me on her syndicated radio show (85 affiliates) to explain this new approach to her evangelical audience. This morning, WorldNetDaily (circulation seven million) published her dynamic and incisive call for Christian protest of what she calls the "Pedophile Protection Act."
Similarly, I was able yesterday to reach a very large evangelical audience. Janet interviewed me again, as did Pat Kiley and Dr. Laurie Roth -- interviews broadcast over at least 325 radio stations, largely Christian, Salem Media affiliates. The seven national broadcasts I did yesterday, ending with Jeff Rense, reached well over a half million Americans, challenging them to call Congress demanding an end to the "pedophile-protecting hate bill."
Democrats Reconnoiter
Without a doubt, massive protest calling, which largely jammed phone lines of Senate Judiciary members Monday morning, is causing Democrats to pause. Cocky and overconfident after their stunning House victory last week, they now seem to be proceeding with caution. Sen. Kennedy's office would betray nothing of strategic importance on Tuesday, nor would Sen. Leahy's. With Democrats one vote shy of a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, are they considering waiting until Al Franken is seated, something that could consume months? Or will they move the hate bill forward rapidly without hearings, counting on pro-hate bill Republicans to give them the necessary advantage? At this time, no one but Democrat power brokers knows the answer to these questions.
One thing we do know: Even though the liberal media and most of the largest mainstream conservative talk shows and print media remain silent regarding even the existence of the hate bill in Congress, you and I, through venues such as talk radio and the internet, are capable of wielding a very large black brush -- a brush that can tar the federal hate crimes bill as the most despised legislation in American history.
Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. Names of all Senate members are posted on the action page at www.truthtellers.org.
Tell all Senators: "Please don't vote for the pedophile-protecting federal hate crimes bill, S. 909. Please insist on Judiciary hearings to debate this very dangerous, freedom-threatening legislation."
Don't let up on your calling to the Senate. Leahy, Kennedy, and Reid are counting on the furor to die down, as other issues and manufactured distractions compete for our attention. They think time is on their side. Actually, it's on ours. In the days, perhaps weeks to come, we have the opportunity to drive home again and again and again to every Senator that voting for a pro-pedophile hate bill is potential political suicide.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Watch the dynamic 10-minute educational video How to Kill the Hate Bills at www.truthtellers.org which explains how the hate bill, S.909, ends freedom. Please tell the offices of members of Congress to watch it! Also at www.truthtellers.org, watch our gripping 82-minute documentary http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/watchpikesvideosgoogle.htm
Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
FOX News Blasts 'Pedophile-Protecting' Hate Bill
Kelly interviewed Rep. Steve King, who attempted to amend the hate bill in Judiciary last week to explicitly exclude pedophiles. King reported how Rep. Alcee Hastings, a pro-hate bill Democrat, proudly claimed practitioners of 547 paraphilias listed by the American Psychiatric Association can "live without fear" once the hate bill is passed.
Ms. Kelly also expressed indignation that, while the Democrats acted to protect pedophiles, they rejected Republican efforts to obtain similar special protection for war veterans. Especially in times of unpopular wars, these are common victims of "hate crimes," spit upon or attacked because of who they are -- military defenders of America's freedom.
Ms. Kelly asked, "What can people do to shut this down?" King said exactly what Truthtellers.org has recommended since hate crimes legislation was introduced into the new Democrat-controlled Congress in early January: "They need to call the Senate. They need to especially call the Senators on the Judiciary CommitteeGive them a personal experience [i.e., don't fax, email, or sign online petitions] And when that happens -- when they understand America is outraged, you can bring about results in the United States Senate. It was proven under immigration. It needs to be proven here under hate crimes." Personal contact by phone is by far the most direct and effective way to stop the hate bill from moving forward onto the floor of the Senate.
Watch Fox's devastating video, http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage
&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=4864621&referralPlaylistId=949437d0db05
ed5f5b9954dc049d70b0c12f2749&maven_referrer=staf
* Share it as widely and quickly as possible.
Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. The names of all members of the Senate including Judiciary members are listed on the
Tell all Senators, especially those on the Judiciary Committee: "Please don't vote for the pedophile-protecting federal hate crimes bill, S. 909. Insist on Judiciary hearings to debate this very dangerous, freedom-threatening legislation."
* Link for Fox News Clip: http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&streamingFormat=
FLASH&referralObject=4864621&referralPlaylistId=949437d
0db05ed5f5b9954dc049d70b0c12f2749&maven_referrer=staf
Hate Bill Hearing Next Tuesday?
Is Leahy underhandedly scheduling a hate bill hearing, to enable pro-hate bill Judiciary Democrats to ram their hate bill forward to passage? I think he is.
I called a Senate Judiciary spokeswoman who told me she is a member of Leahy's staff. She said, "No. This is a hearing about assisting state and local law enforcement. If it were about the hate bill, I believe the Senator would have said so."
"But," I asked, "Could this hearing expand to consider the hate bill in its intention to provide federal assistance to state law enforcement?"
"Yes," she said.
With veiled language, Sen. Leahy is likely fulfilling his promise to announce a hate bill hearing. He is confident most observers will think this hearing is about obscure issues of federal aid to states; no one will perceive the hearing's true purpose.
Leahy is wrong. I hope that every defender of freedom will closely watch
This is a "hearing" to which no witnesses will probably be called. No troublesome Republican debate or amendments may be allowed. Rep. Conyers hoped for this several weeks ago in the House Judiciary. As a result of powerful protest, he did allow Republicans (although without witnesses) to propose amendments to the mark-up session in the House-something he tried to avoid.
I believe Leahy is trying to pull a similar fast one. He hopes to rush the hate bill through by a majority vote, catching Republican Judiciary members unprepared.
Don't let that happen. Call Republican members of the Senate Judiciary NOW and warn them that a probable hate bill hearing will be held next Tuesday. (Their names are listed on our Action Page at www.truthtellers.org.) Encourage Republicans to demand that witnesses be summoned and amendments allowed. Encourage them to put up the same good fight their House counterparts did two weeks ago. Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll.
If indeed this is a hearing unrelated to the hate bill, the attention of an international audience will pressure Judiciary Democrats to keep it that way. But if it expands into a pro-hate bill referendum, thousands including the FOX News Network (http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&streamingFormat
=FLASH&referralObject=4864621&referralPlaylistId=949437d0db05ed5f5b9954dc049d
70b0c12f2749&maven_referrer=staf>now attacking the "pedophile-protecting hate bill") will be instant to sound the alarm.
Leahy made a serious strategic error by scheduling a hate bill hearing yesterday before Wednesday's FOX attack. As anger mounts nationwide at the hate bill, Senate Democrats should lie low and hope it subsides. By instead scheduling a hearing in a less than forthright way, Leahy only incites the fires of suspicion-suspicion that the hate bill, both in content and methods of passage, is duplicitous; it can't withstand the usual rigors of passage or scrutiny imposed on other legislation.
There was a time in previous Congresses when under-the-table hate bill strategies worked. Not today. Today, the whole world is watching.
Monday, May 4, 2009
US may revive military commissions
WASHINGTON (AFP) — The administration of US President Barack Obama is moving toward reviving the military commission system for prosecuting terrorism suspect held at a detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, The New York Times reported.
The military commissions have been criticized by Obama in the past.
But citing unnamed officials, the newspaper said the Obama administration now plans to amend the military commission system created by former president George W. Bush to provide more legal protections for terrorism suspects.
Officials said the first public moves could come as soon as next week, perhaps in filings to military judges at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, the report said.
Continuing the military commissions in any form would probably prompt sharp criticism from human rights groups as well as some of Obama?s political allies, the paper noted.
But officials who work on the Guantanamo issue say administration lawyers have become concerned that they would face significant obstacles to trying some terrorism suspects in federal courts, The Times said.
Judges might find it difficult to prosecute detainees who were subjected to brutal treatment while for prosecutors, it could be difficult to use hearsay evidence gathered by intelligence agencies, the report said.
Senate Judiciary May Vote Hate Bill Tuesday
It is vital that YOU continue to demand hearings on this extremely dangerous, freedom-destroying legislation! Expert witnesses must be summoned from across the country. Republican Senators must be allowed to present objections and amendments.
The hate bill must be slowed down so the controversy over this pedophile-protecting legislation is allowed to approach the magnitude of the IRS "tea party" protests several weeks ago.
Call all members of the Senate, including those on the Judiciary Committee, demanding hearings; names available on Truthtellers.org's
Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. Ask for each Senator by name. Tell them: "Please hold hearings on the very dangerous, pedophile-protecting hate bill, S. 909."
Our chances of defeating the hate bill are much, much greater in the Senate than in the House. But we need time. Only God and the voice of the people can restrain the hate bill from rushing forward to a probable victory in the Senate, as happened in the House last week.
God will do His part in delivering from the hate bill, as He has over the past 10 years.
Will you do yours?
How The New ‘US Hate Laws’ Will Change Our Lives
For The Best US Hate Laws Coverage CLICK: TruthTellers.org Here
Reverend Pike, who is often featured on the Rense Radio Program, has played a key role in defeating federal hate crimes legislation in the past. This time it may be quite different…
_______________________
Brother Nathanael: On April 29, 2009, the US House of Representatives passed the Federal Hate Crimes Bill, HR 1913. The Bill was approved despite compelling testimony by House Republicans who were constrained by a Democrat-imposed “closed rule” on debate and amendments which limited the debate to only one hour and twenty minutes.
Only the day before, apparently in co-ordination with House Democrats, Senator Edward “Ted” Kennedy introduced his Senate version of the Federal Hate Crimes Bill, S 909. If the Hate Crimes Bill is enacted into law, what are the implications for freedom of speech in America?
Reverend Ted Pike: The current Hate Crimes Bill builds upon the Hate Crimes Law of 1968, inspired by Lyndon Johnson’s civil rights legislation. This law criminalizes those who incite a crime committed against a targeted group. However, the law could not be enforced due to State & Local law enforcement prerogatives which created many barriers against federal intrusion.
BUT, the pending Hate Crimes Bill will remove all barriers against federal intrusion of State & Local law enforcement rights. Thus, the Federal government can go after anyone they want to for both “hate” and “felonies” - despite State & Local protection. A Federal police state with absolute power will thus be created. Herein lies the attack on our freedoms, especially, freedom of speech.
Incidentally, the number chosen for the pending Hate Crimes Bill is “HR 1913.” Any number may be chosen, but why “1913?” I don’t think it’s an accident that this number was chosen by the Zionists. For in “1913,” three threats to our freedom occurred: The establishment of the Anti Defamation League (ADL), The Federal Income Tax, and the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. Now the greatest of all threats is about to occur using this ominous date, “1913.” View Entire Story Here, Here & Here.
This current Hate Crimes Bill will eventually enforce the ADL-definition that “hate equals bias” against newly-formed federally protected groups: Homosexuals, Jews, and Muslims. These groups will receive special federal protection in violation of both the 1st & 14th amendments. Thus, if the pending US Hate Crimes Bill becomes law, freedom of speech will be effectively annihilated in America once and for all.
Br Nathanael: Why an “ADL-definition” of what constitutes hate? What does the Anti Defamation League have to do with the pending US Hate Crimes Laws?
Rev. Ted Pike: The Anti Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith, as it was formerly called, is behind it all, that’s why. This super powerful Jewish religious, educational, fraternal, and charitable organization, that is, the B’nai B’rith, has persuaded 55 nations (in which it has 2100 lodges and 200,000 Jewish members) to unite under the authority of a central Hate Crimes command center. It is called the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
The establishment of this international Hate Crimes organization by the B’nai B’rith is but the apex of their hate crimes agenda. Such descends to the community level via the civil rights arm of the B’nai B’rith, the Anti Defamation League. Through their No Place For Hate & A World Of Difference programs in cities and communities throughout America, the ADL intensively organizes city governments, schools, modernist & Zionist-oriented churches, civic organizations, and citizen groups to combat “hate and homophobia” (Bible-Believing Christians) in their communities. The ADL has already infiltrated our public schools with their propaganda with various training and “educational” programs.
Indeed, a national and global hate crimes Gestapo is being created right before our very eyes, if we can only open them to see it. A “thought police” bureaucracy, led by the ADL, will soon harass and indict Christians and the politically incorrect here in America, as they now do in Canada.
Br Nathanael: Can you tell us more about the B’nai B’rith and their role in the pending US Hate Crimes legislation?
Rev. Ted Pike: Americans must understand that the ADL’s parent group, the B’nai B’rith, has established many “tolerance-oriented” lobby groups throughout the world in connection with various political & governmental spheres.
Organizations such as, B’nai B’rith Center for Human Rights and Public Policy, B’nai B’rith Office of United Nations Affairs, and B’nai B’rith Inter-American Convention Against Racism and Xenophobia, have maneuvered themselves into influential governmental realms. The B’nai B’rith boasts of having established the Canadian hate laws bureaucracy in 1971. Of course, money and politics plays a big part in the operations of powerful lobby groups, like the B’nai B’rith lobby.
Br Nathanael: How did the ADL begin its campaign of promoting Hate Crime Laws?
Rev. Ted Pike: The ADL began its promotion of Hate Crime Laws worldwide in 1988 following the infamous Hofstra Conference through which the ADL formed their model “Anti-Hate” legislation proposals with the deception that their proposals only targeted “violent physical hate crimes.” This is exactly what the ADL told lawmakers in Canada, Britain, and Sweden.
Yet, soon after the ADL’s Hate Bill was passed in those countries, it broadened to outlaw “verbal violence” against protected groups. Thus, laws to end “violent hate crimes” soon criminalized free speech.
Br Nathanael: What then is defined as “verbal violence?” And who defines what is “hate” in a person’s verbal articulations?
Rev. Ted Pike: Again, we must point to the Anti Defamation League as the culprit in defining that which constitutes “verbal violence” & “hate.” The ADL, which presently administers the US government’s Hate Crimes Enforcement Program, says that “hate equals bias” against federally protected groups.
Now, what document is most biased against homosexuality? The Holy Bible. Christians thus become potential “hate criminals.” And it is Christians in particular who are the ultimate target of ADL’s twisted and self-serving definitions of hate crimes.
Soon to follow homosexuals, will be another federally protected group, the Jews. Any person critical of the conduct of Jews, (even as the New Testament justly censors the conduct of unbelieving Jews), will be criminalized as perpetrators of “hate speech.” Of course, this is what the ADL is really after, forbidding Christians and all Gentiles to articulate valid criticism against Jewish supremacists.
Br Nathanael: What about the Internet? Will the US Hate Crime Laws prohibit freedom of speech on the Internet?
Rev. Ted Pike: Indeed it will. Today, the ADL/B’nai B’rith Hate Law bureaucracies are proliferating throughout the world, ending free speech and free talk radio.
This has happened already in Canada, England, France, Germany, and Australia with the establishment of ADL’s/B’nai B’rith’s, Department of Global Anti-Semitism in the US State Department, and a 55-nation Hate Crimes bureaucracy centered in Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, as I mentioned earlier.
The threat to free speech on the Internet posed by these groups with their promotion of Hate Laws is an increasingly urgent subject for discussion on talk radio, especially for shows with Internet access.
Br Nathanael: Who will be targeted on the Internet by the Anti Defamation League?
Rev. Ted Pike: Internet talk radio hosts or Internet publicists who criticize homosexuality, Israel, or matters Jewish, will be targeted as “haters” according to the ADL’s International Network Against Cyberhate (INACH).
The purpose of this ADL entity is to implement legal, political, and technological means to end the free speech of such “haters” on the Internet. Quite recently, on March of 2009, INACH shut down a Catholic Website in the UK for being critical of “extremist Jews.”
Curiously, while the ADL/B’nai B’rith/INACH has no problem with the exercise of free speech by homosexuals and pornographers on the Internet, it has a huge problem with those who criticize all matters Jewish.
Br Nathanael: Are we headed for a Zionist-inspired police state?
Rev. Ted Pike: We certainly are. The pending US Hate Crimes Law creates a bias-motivation justice system for America, just like Canada’s. Suspicion of bias motivation behind a crime will justify federal invasion of local law enforcement as I discussed earlier. Such unity of federal and local jurisdiction is the definition of a police state.
And the powerful Jewish group, the ADL, with its Hate Crimes Training has already infiltrated hundreds of local police forces throughout the United States.
Br Nathanael: Is there a chance that the pending US Hate Crimes Bill, HR 1913, can still be defeated?
Rev. Ted Pike: Yes, there is still a chance, if we all do our part. You see, unlike the House, there is a very small margin of Democrats & Republicans in the Senate. If public outrage is overwhelming enough this coming week, then there is a chance that several Democrats will come over and vote with the Republicans against the Hate Crimes Bill. This is what occurred two years ago due to the protests of concerned Americans.
During the recent mark-up in the House Judiciary, Republicans boldly discredited the Hate Crimes Bill as a “pedophile-protecting” Bill. This is documented in my recent video, Stop The Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill.
Everyone should now protest to members of the Senate by calling Toll Free, 1-877-851-6437 or 202-225-3121, and say, “Please Don’t Vote For The Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill, S-909!” I am calling everyone to demand hearings in the Senate Judiciary. This will slow down the passage and encourage Senate Republicans.
The Democrats had hoped to push through the Senate Hate Bill, S-909, as rapidly to passage as the House Bill was. But if a ground swell of protest continues this coming week, there is a very real chance that the Hate Bill can be defeated either by a filibuster or a majority vote against it. So, please call and protest NOW!Brazil Marxist Pres To Criminalize Anti-Gay Speech
BELEN, BRAZIL, April 30, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Brazilian President Luiz Lula is promising homosexual leaders that he will continue to seek to criminalize speech that is critical of homosexuality.
In a written address delivered to the Third Congress of the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites, and Transsexuals (ABGLT), Lula denounced groups, most of them Christian, who have objected to plans to outlaw such speech, calling them "hypocrites."
"Some backward as well as hypocritical sectors ... have criticized our government for supporting initiatives that criminalize words or acts that are offensive to homosexuality," he wrote. "That has no importance. I will continue, with the support of the entire government, to maintain that attitude."
As LifeSiteNews has reported in the past, Lula has for several years sought to pass a "homophobia law" that would make it a crime to criticize homosexual behavior.
Although he has failed to achieve his goal as of yet, in many cases Brazilian courts already enforce existing laws as if they prohibit such speech. Religious groups and individuals have been censored and fined for criticizing homosexual behavior, including one organization whose pro-family campaign was canceled by court order.
Julio Severo, one of Brazil's most famous pro-life and pro-family activists, fled the country recently after investigators sought his address following a complaint of "homophobia" lodged against him. He now lives in exile in an undisclosed location (see LifeSiteNews coverage at http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09040914.html).
At the same conference, Brazil's most influential homosexual leader, Luiz Mott, called on homosexuals to kill attackers in "legitimate defense" according to the homosexual website A Capa.
Citing statistics indicating an increase in the number of murders of homosexuals over the previous year, Mott stated that "if in the next poll this number increases, we must radicalize. And for that purpose we are going to have a campaign where we say 'Kill in legitimate defense, protect yourself."
Although Mott's organization, the Gay Association of Bahia, claims that "homophobic" murders are high, its counts define all murders of all homosexuals as acts of "homophobia," even when they involve male prostitutes apparently killed by a john.
Moreover, the total murder rate for homosexuals documented by Mott is significantly lower than the overall murder rate, per capita, in Brazil, as LifeSiteNews has previously reported. While the overall rate is 28 per 100,000 people, the rate of murders of homosexuals in Brazil is 1.31 per 100,000, according to Mott's statistics.
Homosexualist leaders reacted with alarm to Mott's statements, according to A Capa.
Caio Varela, an advisor to Brazilian Senator Fatima Cleide, complained that "he doesn't understand that tomorrow some queer out there at the end of the world might read that in some site or publication and commit a crime."
See Related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Prominent Pro-Family Activist Julio Severo Flees Brazil to Escape Charges of "Homophobia"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09040914.html
Leader of Brazil Homosexual Movement Under Investigation for Pedophilia
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07073011.html
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jun/08062510.html
Kennedy Introduces Senate Version Of Hate Bill
Unlike in the House, however, there exists in the Senate a very small margin of Democrat pro-hate bill advantage in numbers. Chances of defeat of the hate bill in the Senate are much greater.
It is vital NOW that protest calling begin to all members of the Senate, especially members of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Demand that the Judiciary Committee hold hate bill hearings. They didn't two years ago, rushing the bill to the floor of the Senate where it passed. If hearings are held, hate bill passage will be slowed and Senate Republicans will be stimulated to mount the same vigorous protest House Republicans have shown.
Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. Names of Senate Judiciary members are posted <http://www.truthtellers.org/actionplan.html>here at www.truthtellers.org
Tell all members of the Senate: "Please don't vote for the pedophile-protecting federal hate crimes bill, S. 909. Please insist on Judiciary hearings to debate this very dangerous, freedom-threatening legislation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Watch the dynamic 10-minute educational video How to Kill the Hate Bills at
Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill:
Mix Faith With Hate Bill Action
Yet, delighted as they were with the ascendance of Christian values, there was something missing in the Reagan revolution -- the National Day of Prayer. It had been established in 1775 by Gen. George Washington during the depth of America's struggle for independence but was now, for all practical purposes, forgotten.
My father became concerned that it be revived -- not just in celebration of revival of Christian values but to fulfill its original intention, as an encouragement in time of threat for all Americans of faith to look to their Creator for national deliverance.
With this goal in mind, my father conceived an ambitious plan: to fly our restored 1929 Bellanca monoplane (the same type that first flew the Pacific in 1931) around America on a publicity tour to promote revival of this forgotten national observance.
During the summer of 1980 my father, brother, and I embarked on a huge aerial loop across America, from Portland, Oregon nearly to New York, through the South and back up the Pacific coast from Los Angeles. Through a rock-concert sound system, blasting through a megaphone on the plane's belly, and a huge aerial banner trailing behind, we proclaimed over towns, cities, conservative gatherings, etc., "Pray for America!" On the ground, we gathered many thousands of signatures on petitions to the President, asking him to revive the National Day of Prayer. Out of a host of contacts from coast to coast was created the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog group dedicated to always telling the whole truth and sounding alerts the moment danger threatened freedom.
In short, my father was able to generate a national movement of which the President did take notice. Invited to the White House with other major conservative leaders, he witnessed Pres. Reagan's signing of the reestablished National Day of Prayer on February 6, 1982. It was to be observed every first Thursday in May.
The revived National Day of Prayer has now been nationally participated in by millions of Christians and tens of thousands of churches at least 26 times under circumstances of relatively modest threat. But now, as with Washington at Valley Forge, Christian America will be observing it this Thursday under the very greatest threat -- the imminent passage of a federal hate crimes bill designed to initiate persecution of Christians and end free speech. It will also elevate to a status of special federal protection the vilest members of humanity, sodomites and pedophiles.
Because of these extraordinary circumstances, observation this year must be very different than in years preceding. It must combine the soberest unification of repentance, faith, and entreaty for divine deliverance with the most intelligent and focused political action.
As an heir of the man most responsible (next to Pres. Reagan) for resurrecting the National Day of Prayer, I hope religious leaders will honor my call that right now they organize within their churches a spiritual/political equivalent of the massive IRS "tea party" protests of two weeks ago.
Here's what I believe we should do:
1. Christian laity should inform their pastors (and other pastors in their area) of the hate bill threat. The quickest way is to have them watch my latest 10-minute video "Stop the Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill!" at
2. >From the pulpit this Sunday, pastors should thoroughly inform their congregants of this crisis. They should schedule gatherings in their church throughout the first week of May for the purpose of intensive prayer and action.
3. Prepared with the list of all U.S. Senators from the
Moment Of Destiny
The National Day of Prayer was designed by Pres. Washington, and its revival envisioned by my father, to serve both good times and bad. With pro-homosexual Democrats ruling the nation, we are now definitely in a bad time and a bad way. The same number of Christians and their young people who might this week gather by the tens of thousands in "Christian rock concerts" across America as well as other amusements should cancel those events. Instead, they should gather in our churches in what Gen. Washington called national "humiliation, fasting and prayer" in penance for how the church has allowed evil to achieve national dominance, praying that God will stay His righteous judgment upon our land.
We need to hear all across America the mixed murmur of millions of Christian voices, some entreating, "Lord save us!" and an equal number dialing 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll, saying: "Please don't vote for Sen. Kennedy's pedophile-protecting hate bill, S. 909."
If we respond as we should, the incense of prayer mixed with the hushed staccato of cell phones dialing and voices protesting to the Senate will arise as a "sweet-smelling savor" to the God who gave us our freedom. In this time of gravest national peril, it will be more pleasing in His ears than any hymn.
Stop The Pedophile Protecting Hate Bill
Today, Sunday, we re-shot some parts, tightened others, and added graphics so it more powerfully communicates the horror of what H. R. 1913 proposes.
Please watch this new version with your friends. Recommend it as widely as possible. This week may be the big hate bill showdown, as a possibly rebellious Democrat Senate may push the hate bill to a floor vote-despite overwhelming protest now coming from Americans, especially the mainstream religious right.
Even if you called last week, call again! Every voice is needed. Every call matters.
The top priority? DEMAND HATE BILL HEARINGS!
Watch the dynamic 10-minute educational video How to Kill the Hate Bills at www.truthtellers.org which explains how the hate bill, S.909, ends freedom. Please tell the offices of members of Congress to watch it! Also at www.truthtellers.org, watch our gripping 82-minute documentary http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/watchpikesvideosgoogle.htm
Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
UK Jews, Muslims Succeed In Avoiding Autopsies
Jewish and Muslim groups have been pressing for a change in the law which would replace surgical post-mortems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Both Islam and Judaism emphasise the sanctity of the body after death. Both religions request that a body should be prepared by the family, washed and buried as soon as possible.
Under the new proposed regulations, if the cause of death remains undetermined from a scan, families would have to accept a full post-mortem before a death certificate was issued. They would also have to foot the bill for the scan, which costs approximately £500.
HR 669 Anti-Pet Bill - Pure Madness
Monday, March 30, 2009
New Legislation Authorizes FEMA Camps In U.S.
A new bill introduced in Congress authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to set up a network of FEMA camp facilities to be used to house U.S. citizens in the event of a national emergency.
The National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645 mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of to providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill.
The legislation also states that the camps will be used to “provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations”.
Ominously, the bill also states that the camps can be used to “meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security,” an open ended mandate which many fear could mean the forced detention of American citizens in the event of widespread rioting after a national emergency or total economic collapse.
Many credible forecasters have predicted riots and rebellions in America that will dwarf those already witnessed in countries like Iceland and Greece.
With active duty military personnel already being stationed inside the U.S. under Northcom, partly for purposes of “crowd control,” fears that Americans could be incarcerated in detainment camps are all too real.
The bill mandates that six separate facilities be established in different Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions (FEMA) throughout the country.
The camps will double up as “command and control” centers that will also house a “24/7 operations watch center” as well as training facilities for Federal, State, and local first responders.
The bill also contains language that will authorize camps to be established within closed or already operating military bases around the country.
As we have previously highlighted, in early 2006 Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root was awarded a $385 million dollar contract by Homeland Security to construct detention and processing facilities in the event of a national emergency.
The language of the preamble to the agreement veils the program with talk of temporary migrant holding centers, but it is made clear that the camps would also be used “as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency.”
As far back as 2002, FEMA sought bids from major real estate and engineering firms to construct giant internment facilities in the case of a chemical, biological or nuclear attack or a natural disaster.
A much discussed and circulated report, the Pentagon’s Civilian Inmate Labor Program, was more recently updated and the revision details a “template for developing agreements” between the Army and corrections facilities for the use of civilian inmate labor on Army installations.”
Alex Jones has attended numerous military urban warfare training drills across the US where role players were used to simulate arresting American citizens and taking them to internment camps.
Read the new legislation in full below.
————————————————————————
National Emergency Centers Establishment Act (Introduced in House)
HR 645 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 645
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2009
Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
——————————————————————————–
A BILL
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `National Emergency Centers Establishment Act’.
SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.
(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure–
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;
(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;
(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and
(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AS NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate not fewer than 6 military installations as sites for the establishment of national emergency centers.
(b) Minimum Requirements- A site designated as a national emergency center shall be–
(1) capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster;
(2) environmentally safe and shall not pose a health risk to individuals who may use the center;
(3) capable of being scaled up or down to accommodate major disaster preparedness and response drills, operations, and procedures;
(4) capable of housing existing permanent structures necessary to meet training and first responders coordination requirements during nondisaster periods;
(5) capable of hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance needs;
(6) required to consist of a complete operations command center, including 2 state-of-the art command and control centers that will comprise a 24/7 operations watch center as follows:
(A) one of the command and control centers shall be in full ready mode; and
(B) the other shall be used daily for training; and
(7) easily accessible at all times and be able to facilitate handicapped and medical facilities, including during an emergency or major disaster.
(c) Location of National Emergency Centers- There shall be established not fewer than one national emergency center in each of the following areas:
(1) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions I, II, and III.
(2) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV.
(3) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions V and VII.
(4) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI.
(5) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions VIII and X.
(6) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX.
(d) Preference for Designation of Closed Military Installations- Wherever possible, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate a closed military installation as a site for a national emergency center. If the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense jointly determine that there is not a sufficient number of closed military installations that meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), the Secretaries shall jointly designate portions of existing military installations other than closed military installations as national emergency centers.
(e) Transfer of Control of Closed Military Installations- If a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security administrative jurisdiction over such closed military installation.
(f) Cooperative Agreement for Joint Use of Existing Military Installations- If an existing military installation other than a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a cooperative agreement to provide for the establishment of the national emergency center.
(g) Reports-
(1) PRELIMINARY REPORT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site–
(A) an outline of the reasons why the site was selected;
(B) an outline of the need to construct, repair, or update any existing infrastructure at the site;
(C) an outline of the need to conduct any necessary environmental clean-up at the site;
(D) an outline of preliminary plans for the transfer of control of the site from the Secretary of Defense to the Secretary of Homeland Security, if necessary under subsection (e); and
(E) an outline of preliminary plans for entering into a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f).
(2) UPDATE REPORT- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site–
(A) an update on the information contained in the report as required by paragraph (1);
(B) an outline of the progress made toward the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);
(C) an outline of the progress made toward entering a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and
(D) recommendations regarding any authorizations and appropriations that may be necessary to provide for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.
(3) FINAL REPORT- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site–
(A) finalized information detailing the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);
(B) the finalized cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and
(C) any additional information pertinent to the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.
(4) ADDITIONAL REPORTS- The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, may submit to Congress additional reports as necessary to provide updates on steps being taken to meet the requirements of this Act.
SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.
This Act does not affect–
(1) the authority of the Federal Government to provide emergency or major disaster assistance or to implement any disaster mitigation and response program, including any program authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.); or
(2) the authority of a State or local government to respond to an emergency.
SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There is authorized to be appropriated $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 to carry out this Act. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act, the following definitions apply:
(1) CLOSED MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term `closed military installation’ means a military installation, or portion thereof, approved for closure or realignment under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) that meet all, or 2 out of the 3 following requirements:
(A) Is located in close proximity to a transportation corridor.
(B) Is located in a State with a high level or threat of disaster related activities.
(C) Is located near a major metropolitan center.
(2) EMERGENCY- The term `emergency’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
(3) MAJOR DISASTER- The term `major disaster’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
(4) MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term `military installation’ has the meaning given such term in section 2910 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).
Research related articles:
- Rangel To Push Universal Military Draft Legislation Once More
- FEMA sources confirm coming martial law
- The failure of the NIST WTC 7 report to address concerns raised in Appendix C of the 2002 FEMA Building Performance Study
- Treasury Sends to Congress Legislation to Buy Troubled Assets
- Pentagon to Detail Troops to Bolster Domestic Security
- Hurricane Gustav: National Emergency Environment Sets the Stage for the McCain Election Campaign
- NIST Concludes “Fire” Caused WTC 7 “Collapse” when FEMA Report Concluded Fuel Tank Explosion had “low probability” of Knocking Down Tower
- Military Examines Role In Domestic Defense
- Torture Camps Minutes From Olympic Sites
- U.S. troops may be deployed in Arizona, Southwest U.S.
- List of Labor Camps Released to International Journalists in China
- There Might Be a Financial Crisis, But the World’s Arms Dealers Are Doing Just Fine
Sunday, March 29, 2009
HR 875 The food police, criminalizing organic farming and the backyard gardener, and violation of the 10th amendment
HR 875 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c111:1:./temp/~c1112RD9bb:e11439:
This bill is sitting in committee and I am not sure when it is going to hit the floor. One thing I do know is that very few of the Representatives have read it. As usual they will vote on this based on what someone else is saying. Urge your members to read the legislation and ask for opposition to this devastating legislation. Devastating for everyday folks but great for factory farming ops like Monsanto, ADM, Sodexo and Tyson to name a few.
I have no doubt that this legislation was heavily influenced by lobbyists from huge food producers. This legislation is so broad based that technically someone with a little backyard garden could get fined and have their property siezed. It will affect anyone who produces food even if they do not sell but only consume it. It will literally put all independent farmers and food producers out of business due to the huge amounts of money it will take to conform to factory farming methods. If people choose to farm without industry standards such as chemical pesticides and fertilizers they will be subject to a vareity of harassment from this completely new agency that has never before existed. That's right, a whole new government agency is being created just to police food, for our own protection of course.
DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, READ THIS LEGISLATION FOR YOURSELF. The more people who read this legislation the more insight we are going to get and be able to share. Post your observations and insights below. Urge your members to read this legislation and to oppose the passage of this legislation.
Pay special attention to
- Section 3 which is the definitions portion of the bill-read in it's entirety.
- section 103, 206 and 207- read in it's entirety.
Red flags I found and I am sure there are more...........
- Legally binds state agriculture depts to enforcing federal guidelines effectively taking away the states power to do anything other than being food police for the federal dept.
- Effectively criminalizes organic farming but doesn't actually use the word organic.
- Affects anyone growing food even if they are not selling it but consuming it.
- Affects anyone producing meat of any kind including the processing wild game for personal consumption.
- Legislation is so broad based that every aspect of growing or producing food can be made illegal. There are no specifics which is bizarre considering how long the legislation is.
- Section 103 is almost entirely about the administrative aspect of the legislation. It will allow the appointing of officials from the factory farming corporations and lobbyists and classify them as experts and allow them to determine and interpret the legislation. Who do you think they are going to side with?
- Section 206 defines what will be considered a food production facility and what will be enforced up all food production facilities. The wording is so broad based that a backyard gardener could be fined and more.
- Section 207 requires that the state's agriculture dept act as the food police and enforce the federal requirements. This takes away the states power and is in violation of the 10th amendment.
- There are many more but by the time I got this far in the legislation I was so alarmed that I wanted to bring someone's attention to it. (to the one person who reads my blog)
Didn't Stalin nationalize farming methods that enabled his administration to gain control over the food supply? Didn't Stalin use the food to control the people?
Last word...... Legislate religion and enforce gag orders on ministers on what can and can't be said in the pulpit, instituting regulations forcing people to rely soley on the government, control the money and the food. What is that called? It is on the tip of my tongue..........
I haven't read any of the Senate's version of the bill as I have been poring thru the House's version. Here is the link and I hope some of you can take a look and post your observations and insights below. One thing I am pretty sure of is that very few if any Senator's have actually read the legislation and when it comes up for a vote they will more than likely take someone else's word on how they should vote. The other thing I am pretty sure about is that the legislation was probably written by lobbyists and industry experts.
S 425 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:s425:
Things you can do
- Contact your members at 202-224-3121 and ask them to oppose HR 875 and S 425. While you are at it ask them if they personally have read the legislation and what their position is? If they have not read the legislation ask them to read it and politely let them know that just because other representitives are not reading the legislation and voting on it does not mean they can do the same.
- Get in touch with local farmers and food producers by attending a local farmers market and asking them how business is.
- Attend a local WAPF meeting, this is a good start to learning about what is going on in farming and local & state initiatives . The website is http://www.westonaprice.org/localchapters/index.html
- Check out the Farmers Legal Defense Fund at http://www.ftcldf.org/index.html
- Find out who sits on your states agriculture and farming committee and contact them with your concerns.
- Continue to contact your elected officials and let them know your position on legislation and why.
- Get active at the local and state levels, this is the quickest way to initiate change.
